SCI

1 September 2024

Molecular and Clinicopathologic Impact of GNAS Variants Across Solid Tumors

(IF: J Clin Oncol., 42.1)

  • Johannet P, Abdelfattah S, Wilde C, Patel S, Walch H, Rousseau B, Argiles G, Artz O, Patel M, Arfe A, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Ganesh K, Schultz N, Diaz LA, Foote MB. Molecular and Clinicopathologic Impact of GNAS Variants Across Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 9:JCO2400186. 

  • CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:Michael B. Foote, MD; Twitter: @MikeFooteMD; e-mail: footem@mskcc.org.


PURPOSE 目的

The molecular drivers underlying mucinous tumor pathogenicity are poorly understood. GNAS mutations predict metastatic burden and treatment resistance in mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma. We investigated the pan-cancer clinicopathologic relevance of GNAS variants. 

粘液性肿瘤的致病分子机制尚不明确。GNAS突变可预测粘液性阑尾腺癌的转移负荷和治疗耐药性。我们研究了GNAS变异在泛癌种中的临床病理相关性。


METHODS 方法

We assessed 58,043 patients with Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (IMPACT)–sequenced solid tumors to identify oncogenic variants, including GNAS, associated with mucinous tumor phenotype. We then performed comprehensive molecular analyses to compare GNAS-mutant (mut) and wild-type tumors across cancers. Gene expression patterns associated with GNAS-mut tumors were assessed in a The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. Associations between GNAS variant status and peritoneal metastasis, first-line systemic therapy response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined using a propensity-matched subcohort of patients with metastatic disease. 

我们对58,043名接受过Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (IMPACT)测序的实体肿瘤患者进行了评估,以识别与粘液性肿瘤表型相关的致癌变异,包括GNAS。随后,我们进行了全面的分子分析,比较了不同癌症中的GNAS突变型(mut)和野生型肿瘤。我们还在The Cancer Genome Atlas队列中评估了与GNAS突变型肿瘤相关的基因表达模式。我们使用具有转移性疾病患者的倾向性匹配子队列,确定了GNAS变异状态与腹膜转移、一线全身治疗反应、无进展生存期(PFS)和总体生存期(OS)之间的关系。


RESULTS 结果

Mucinous tumors were enriched for oncogenic GNAS variants. GNAS was mutated in >1% of small bowel, cervical, colorectal, pancreatic, esophagogastric, hepatobiliary, and GI neuroendocrine cancers. Across these cancers, GNAS-mut tumors exhibited a generally conserved C-to-T mutation-high, aneuploidy low molecular profile with co-occurring prevalent KRAS variants (65% of GNAS-mut tumors) and fewer TP53 alterations. GNAS-mut tumors exhibited recurrently comutated alternative tumor suppressors (RBM10, INPPL1) and upregulation of MAPK and cell surface modulators. GNAS-mut tumors demonstrate an increased prevalence of peritoneal metastases (odds ratio [OR], 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5]; P = .006), worse response to first-line systemic therapy (OR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.3 to 3.8]; P = .003), and shorter PFS (median, 5.6 v 7.0 months; P = .047). In a multivariable analysis, GNAS mutated status was independently prognostic of worse OS (hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.56]; adjusted P = .04). 

粘液性肿瘤富含致癌GNAS变异。GNAS在1%以上的小肠、宫颈、结直肠、胰腺、食管胃、肝胆和胃肠神经内分泌癌中发生突变。在这些癌症中,GNAS-mut肿瘤通常表现出保守的C到T突变高、非整倍体低的分子特征,同时出现普遍的KRAS变异(占GNAS-mut肿瘤的65%)和较少的TP53变异。GNAS-mut肿瘤表现出反复突变的替代肿瘤抑制因子(RBM10、INPPL1)以及MAPK和细胞表面调节剂的上调。GNAS-mut肿瘤显示出腹膜转移的患病率增加(比值比[OR],1.7 [95% CI,1.1至2.5]; P = .006),对一线全身治疗的反应更差(OR,2.2 [95% CI,1.3至3.8]; P = .003),以及更短的PFS(中位数,5.6个月对比7.0个月;P = .047)。在多变量分析中,GNAS突变状态独立预测了更差的OS(风险比,1.25 [95% CI,1.01至1.56];调整后P = .04)。


CONCLUSION 结论

Across the assessed cancers, GNAS-mut tumors exhibit a conserved molecular and clinical phenotype defined by mucinous tumor status, increased peritoneal metastasis, poor response to first-line systemic therapy, and worse survival.

在评估的癌症中,GNAS-mut肿瘤表现出保守的分子和临床表型。其特征是粘液性肿瘤状态、腹膜转移增加、对一线全身治疗反应不佳以及较差的生存期。


喜欢SCI天天读的理由

陪您一起学习SCI医学论文

每天5分钟,让自己的英语牛逼起来

特殊福利让您惊喜连连


复制链接或点击原文链接,即可下载SCI原文

W230N03

链接:https://pan.baidu.com/s/1u3ZiIASzFUyjHHjgyb59zQ?pwd=mdts

提取码:mdts